Synthetic inquiry: product information request. Product: not provided.
GUIDED DEMO · 04 / 06
Synthetic data onlyMedical information & inquiry management
Change the choices and explore the workflow’s decision points.
INTERACTIVE WORKFLOW
Uses no AI attemptMatch the inquiry with the right information and reviewer.
THE EFFECT OF YOUR CHOICES
Some checks need attention before review.
Product identifiedCheck
Current process source selected✓
Inquiry matched to reviewer✓
This flow demonstrates intake and routing. It does not provide a clinical response. In a real implementation, safety reports follow separate authorised processes.
A rule-based prepared example. No task, response or transfer is sent.
01 · SAMPLE TO SEND TO AI
Evidence and checks for your selected sample
Selected process source: MQ-SOP v2 · current. Current process: clarify product and scope; route information requests to medical, packaging reports to quality for review.
Selected reviewer: medical. Process check: correct missing information, source version or reviewer match. The source is fictional process information, not clinical evidence or product claims.
What will we ask AI?
Check product identification, source version and reviewer matching. Suggest corrections only for failing checks; otherwise prepare an internal review note. Do not produce a clinical response.
Checking your session
FROM THE EXAMPLE TO YOUR WORKFLOW
Start the conversation with a concrete brief.
Review the selected sample, three adaptations, data needs and two measures in one brief. Edit it and optionally attach it to your request.
HOW WOULD THIS WORK FOR YOU?
Discuss this solution for my teamThe same idea. A solution for your workflow.
Inquiry types and routing rules · Approved responses and source library · Expert roles and service targets