From content to approval, in one workspace.
Drafts, sources and feedback live in separate files. Teams struggle to track which source supports each claim and who owns the next review.
Marketing, medical, regulatory and content teams
Turkish workspace using synthetic data. The guided demo, controls and explanations are available in English.
One workflow. Visible decision points.
Make the output and decision owner clear at every step, from preparation to review.
Define the brief and intended audience.
Review the draft alongside its sources.
Collect feedback on the same version.
Track approvals and version history.
Source-informed drafts, flags for unsupported claims and review suggestions.
The authorised team retains responsibility for claims, audience suitability and publication. AI does not provide medical or regulatory approval.
Your rules. Your workflow.
- Review roles and sequence
- Brand, product and channel templates
- Source library and version rules
Document repositories, content platforms and approval systems; access and API feasibility are assessed during discovery.
Time from first draft to approval
Revisions per content item
Share of claims with checked sources
Baselines and targets are agreed during discovery. These are not claimed customer outcomes.
A fictional Novera physician-information draft
Review the prepared sample, request an AI response and see where human review belongs.
What could we improve in your workflow?
Let’s clarify your needs and the right starting point in a free, 30-minute conversation.